Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL ALIAS SHADDI versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / Q 34 The evidence of a good prosecutor stated that after reading the Fajr prayer and reciting the Quran, the deceased was a donkey in the story of which he was allegedly an asshole. There was no recovery from the fugitives. Under Section 2342, the accused were not taken to them, the CCPC prosecution could not be availed that the eyewitnesses were neither natural nor true witnesses and were not present at the relevant time at the scene of the incident. Or the manner in which the prosecution claimed they were acquitted under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. State 2010 YLR 3108
• Rana PERVAIZ AKHTAR v. MUHAMMAD UMAR FAROOQ PASHA 2010 YLR 3111
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD BILAL 2010 YLR 3114
• FAYYAZ alias BAGGI v. State 2010 YLR 3125
• Mrs. SHAUKAT AMJID v. Sheikh AHMAD SAEED 2010 YLR 3137
• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER NAROWAL 2010 YLR 3142
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2010 YLR 3150
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. YASEEN 2010 YLR 3159

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Mustang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes