Section 13 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Rental controller scope restored its order by rent, controller effect on inspection of documents available on record Petitioners challenged rent controller's order in constitutional application Was. Under Section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, the rent controller had no jurisdiction to review his order. Respondents contended that the unpaid order was not in fact an overview, but rather a ruling that the jurisdiction that was available to the rental control agency that was able to issue the order also contained He could vary or remember the order that the rent controller had inherent authority to amend his own order under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Citizen Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 and, in keeping with the parties' requests, the landlord and The frame issue attached order regarding the existence of the tenant relationship showed that the rent controller Had withdrawn its order regarding the examination of the documents available on record under its hereditary jurisdiction. Although it was an eviction request and the parties had been arguing with each other for a long time, it was appropriate that the rental controller make a speedy decision on the application and thus the rental controller was instructed by the HC. It had to make a decision within two months of disclosure of the insurance application. The deputy registrar of the High Court missed the constitutional request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
