Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus YASEEN

Section 8 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the specific performance suit for the sale of the Section 12 contract offers an offer of acceptance if the defendant's special counsel stated on the oath that the defendant No agreement with Aliyah was executed. On the oath of the plaintiff, then the plaintiff's dismissal, the special counsel stated that the case was serious and that the defendants had never entered into an agreement with the plaintiff to effect, in light of the special counsel's statement regarding the oath, the plaintiff's case Excluded which must be in accordance with all consent decree The plaintiff cannot be allowed to resign his pledge

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL alias SHADDI v. State 2010 YLR 3127
• Mrs. SHAUKAT AMJID v. Sheikh AHMAD SAEED 2010 YLR 3137
• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER NAROWAL 2010 YLR 3142
• ALLAH DITTA v. State 2010 YLR 3150
• EHSANULLAH v. MANZAR HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 3161
• SHAHZAD alias SAJID v. State 2010 YLR 3164
• Mst. SHUMAILA BIBI v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2010 YLR 3167
• HABIB MUSTAFA v. State 2010 YLR 3171

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes