RANA AHSAN MAHMOOD AHID versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, FAISALABAD
Section 9 (1) (b) of section 9, the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 may be interpreted in section 9 (1) (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, thereby granting an individual the option to do so. Or do not do any work The naked reading of the end of the above section, which will be considered as a deed and no separate case will be made for it. Which provides clarity and meaning that if the wife claims in the case filed by her husband, then she will be prevented from raising her claim in a separate suit, the interpretation of Section 9 is also from another angle. It can be seen where, under O VIII, R, the CPC parties were allowed to raise their claim in the aforesaid case, so that they could not be subjected to numerous litigation first, moreover, the basis of the set-off. However, they can easily reduce their spending, which is solely intended to be removed from section 9 (1) (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, so that this section is not It was rumored that the wife could raise her claim in a written, written statement to be able to withhold her expenses. But to ease the inconvenience that the parties had to go through throughout the litigation process
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
