Section 12 (2) of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 52 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Jurisdiction to remove their application under Section 12 (2), CPC Challenged the conclusions based on the fact that the applicants were wrong, it was necessary for the outstanding purchasers and plaintiffs of the disputed land to include the applicants 'names in the defendants' row, but the respondents concealed the facts and sent the court. In the dark, he obtained a decree against the applicants that a special performance case has been filed. Before and after the registered sale process in favor of the applicants, therefore, under the rule of Les Pendens, the applicant could not challenge the order that the registered cell deed in favor of the applicant in the interest of the applicants. Was executed after about 11 months. While filing a lawsuit, filing a civil suit, there was no reason to impose a predator in the interest of pets as the iTunners party could not request poor buyers without consideration because they Did not purchase the disputed land before the lawsuit, no fraudulent request by the respondents proved that verification could not be ordered in the constituency. The High Court dismissed the constitutional application
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
