MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus SESSIONS JUDGE, TOBA TEK SINGH
Sections 249A, 516A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 379/411 Receipt of theft and theft of stolen property, application for termination of order, application for the accused, Which was acquitted by the trial court under section 249A. After his victory, the CRPC, for the first time, submitted a petition to the Judicial Magistrate for a refund of the stolen money at Superdie, which was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate through a Speaking Order, charged against the magistrate's order. The review petition filed by, was accepted by the session judge, a disputed order was approved for the surrender of the stolen money and the petitioner / complainant filed an order to quash the order, the accused at any time during the proceedings. Did not claim the case property, even in the application for breach filed under Section 249A, CRPC The police did not mention. Illegal money was recovered. Or was it because the accused had ample opportunity to file his claim on the case property before the injunction, but nothing was done by him, to present the lawyer for the complainant's unwanted order? I was searched for and separated by merit. By the High Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
