Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed denied the testimony of both witnesses, the statement of another witness in relation to both cases, although they were not presented by the prosecution, but the accused presented the defense as a witness. What was , Who confirmed the statement that the two prosecution witnesses to the extent that they simultaneously said that the two witnesses and the other prosecutor's witnesses went to the field of testimony where they found a body that was not identified. The statement made by the complainant in the FIR was false. They were cross-examined, but nothing conducive to prosecution could be brought to the record, neither the two witnesses, who were allegedly extra-judicial confessed, nor the place and time mentioned when such. Extra judicial confession was charged with guilt, extra-judicial confession was committed the crime could hardly be believed by the accused as both witnesses were closely related to the victim and after hearing it from the joint accused or his mouth. Do not leave that he killed the deceased, both witnesses do not bother to arrest the accused after hearing the alleged confession. The reaction of both witnesses, in which case the accused's unnatural and untrustworthy confession was not voluntary, even voluntary, contradicts the medical evidence in the story described in the FIR. Has been declared a victim of conflict. Given the close relationship of the prosecution witnesses with the deceased and the fact that there is some dispute over a piece of land between the three parties, the false interference of the accused cannot be denied in this case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
