ATTA ULLAH KHAN MALIK versus FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN
Arts 199, 25 and 18 Public interest litigation The current public auction of public (railway) land was publicly advertised, however, later, a number of public complaints and surveillance reports against the auction were answered. In the meantime, all such auctions were canceled and the bid amount was returned to the bidders. After a two-year hiatus, without public tender or public auction, respondents were given a similar plot of lease by backdoor for agricultural purposes, with the highest bidder for the respondent in the letter. Has been told Nevertheless, there was no public auction on the lease of plots), and the authorities subsequently contracted with the respondent's authorized authority to grant public land licenses for agricultural purposes and nurseries, resulting in the defendant's agricultural lease. Converted to a commercial lease. And accordingly, the functioning of the department appearing in C was told to the defendant that our department failed to disclose any rules that allowed leasing of questions without public tender or public auction, once After open plots of plots are canceled, all bids under it are automatically canceled as well. The bid given by him was the highest bid received by the authorities and he demonstrated misunderstandings and was mistaken and could not be traced without public tendering and competitive bidding. The bid given by the respondent was the most public in the department. And dare to misrepresent facts and lie on record. The auction was canceled in 2005
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
