Find a Lawyer

INAYAT HUSSAIN ALIAS INAYATULLAH versus CHAUDHRY SULTAN AHMAD

Claim of legal action on the motion to file a statement for submission of Section 42 declaration The plaintiff dismissed the case on the basis of the offer made by the defendant that, if the defendant's testimony was made, by special oath On the special statement, the Court of Appeal set the trial court's decision and the decision on the basis that the defendant had withdrawn his offer before recording the witness's statement, the defendant accepted the offer. His statement was recorded on the same statement. The day's offer and acceptance came in the presence of advice for the parties. The very order of presentation and acceptance is mentioned in the Order Sheet which was declared enforceable without recording the parties' separate statements and the party was not allowed to resign. The plaintiff failed to apply in any case. It may be that his offer is the result of his emotional behavior or that the offer and acceptance may have been a GI. Promoting any false agreement Defendant could not cite any such reason in his plea to the Appellate Court in this dispute. Failure to adhere to the facts and law involved And the High Court disposed of the decision. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• AFRAHIM SHAKEEL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 589
• ZULFIQAR MUSTAFA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 PCrLJ 590
• PITRIS MASIH v. Mst. SALEENA 2010 CLC 591
• MUHAMMAD MAJID HANIF v. ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY BAHAWALPUR, through Vice-Chancellor 2010 YLR 595
• Rana MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 598
• ATIF ABAIDULLAH v. State 2010 MLD 599
• SHAHRAY KHAN v. Mst. AZIZ FATIMAH 2010 YLR 599
• ATTA ULLAH KHAN MALIK v. FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan 2010 PLD 605

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Sangote lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes