Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 489F shamelessly issuing a check bail, the defendant's grant was behind bars for the last six months and it was a previous unlawful act and the fact of the alleged offense by the other side. Was not inconsistent. The prohibition clause of section 497 (1) did not come up, CRPC was a rule governing bail in such cases and the exception was denied No unusual circumstances were found that the accused was denied bail. May be given. The trial, hardly a ground that the accused refuses to grant bail in connection with the bail of the case; the accused cannot be denied bail because of the commencement of the bail, the accused has been granted bail, under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ZULFIQAR MUSTAFA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 PCrLJ 590
• PITRIS MASIH v. Mst. SALEENA 2010 CLC 591
• MUHAMMAD MAJID HANIF v. ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY BAHAWALPUR, through Vice-Chancellor 2010 YLR 595
• INAYAT HUSSAIN alias INAYATULLAH v. Chaudhry SULTAN AHMAD 2010 CLC 596
• ATIF ABAIDULLAH v. State 2010 MLD 599
• SHAHRAY KHAN v. Mst. AZIZ FATIMAH 2010 YLR 599
• ATTA ULLAH KHAN MALIK v. FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan 2010 PLD 605
• TAHIR ABBAS v. State 2010 YLR 607

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

patent advocate from Cherat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes