Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MEHMOOD CH. versus KARAKURUM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY THROUGH ACTING REGISTRAR

Article 28 The jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction and the duties of the public business courts should not be in interference with the internal affairs and administrative affairs of the educational institutions or in the decree passed by such institutions in the public interest, unless this order is made public Approved by. Acting on a deliberate basis other than the public interest which cannot be justified by any law, the principle of non-interference of courts in the domestic affairs of an educational institution cannot be so attractive in such matters. Must apply. Under the law of natural justice, public workers could not be allowed to seize the legal rights of the people for their own satisfaction and the courts would be legal and morally responsible for the protection of the rights of the people by invalidating the wrong done to them. Were under duty. \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Northern, 2010

• MIRZA HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan 2010 CLC 151
• ALL GILGIT BALTISTAN WORKERS TRADE UNION FEDERATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Kashmir Affairs and Northern Areas Division, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 162
• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 CLC 186
• MCB BANK LIMITED through President, MCB Chambers, Karachi v. RIZWAN ALI KHAN 2010 PLC(CS) 200
• HANIFULLAH v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, NA\'sGilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 331
• Mst. SADIQA BANO v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, N.As., Gilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 521
• MUHAMMAD HABIL v. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, N.As., Giilgit 2010 PLC(CS) 753
• MUHAMMAD MUSA v. JAN MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 807

All Northern judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Okara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes