UPGRADATION OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS/STAFF AND ALLOWANCES ETC. versus
Subordinate Judicial Officers of the Subordinate Judiciary in Arts 9, 61, and 76 Upgraded Petitioners Prayed for the Upgrade of Judicial Officers, Staff and Allowance Gilgit-Baltistan, It was part of Pakistan and followed the judicial policy implemented in Pakistan, Gilgit The Belgian judiciary will certainly benefit. And the disparity in the quality of the judicial service of Gilgit-Baltistan will certainly be eliminated which will lead to an independent judiciary The concept of independence of the judiciary was not limited to judicial officers, but judicial independence was mostly administrative and financial. Depends on freedom Executive interference in judicial affairs can greatly affect their chances of service and the terms and conditions of service directly or indirectly affect the independence of the judiciary with better terms and conditions, ensuring the independence of the judicial officer as expected. ? Under the general Northern Territory Governance Order, 1994 and now the Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, the superior judiciary of Gilgit-Baltistan was regarded as equivalent to the superior judiciary of Pakistan and subordinate to this principle. The judiciary should be treated as a subordinate judiciary in the provinces of Pakistan in Gilgit-Baltistan, and it would be fair to follow the policy of the High Courts in the provinces of Pakistan with regard to the upgrade of the judicial officers in the subordinate judiciary. To remove the differences in the judicial service levels and standards in Gilgit-Baltistan and to bring to light the principle of equal and fair and equitable treatment of judicial services in the provinces of Pakistan, the Supreme Appellate Court held that the Judicial Officers of the Subordinate Judiciary were in Gilgit. Advantages of Baltistan Upgrade Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
