KAMARAN KHAN versus SECRETARY FOR KASHMIR AND NORTHERN AREAS AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD
SECTION 42 SWITCH, For Declaration Royalty, the courts below the factual rate of determination of the plaintiffs have demanded 100% additional royalty from the plaintiffs for extracting and carrying wood suit and the appeal filed by the plaintiffs to the trial court And the lower appellate court dismissed the proceedings, respectively. Under the jurisdiction of the amended jurisdiction, the conclusions of the two courts are retained. Authorities reviewed / revised their first decision to increase royalty and increased the royalty rate on wood by 25% instead of 100% because such authorities could not impose 100% royalty. The Chief Justice did not discuss the decision in his decision on the important point that the wood was extracted and taken by the plaintiffs, in which it was incorrectly held that the plaintiffs did not challenge the decision wires in relation to the increase of royal favor. And it appears that the issue revolving around such a rate of the full 100 ro RO was not justified by the plaintiffs for extracting and exporting wood and it was declared illegal and the authorities 100 of Instead of obtaining royalties from the Supreme Court of Appeal for this case, keeping the decisions and orders of the three courts below. Decided in favor. Appeals from the defendants were allowed
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
