Sections 4 and 18 of the Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Factors Dealing with Land Acquisition Previous award officials have charged land compensation as determined by the referee court and the Chief Court. The owner of the underground land sale performed the work. Transactions in the adjoining area in which the land cost was about Rs 7,000 per marl (Rs 140,000 per kanal), while the authorities paid Rs 50,000 per kinal to determine the value of the land according to the principle of property. Determining whether the price offered by the voluntary buyer was acceptable to a willing seller or not, the relevant factors should be considered primarily in determining the value of the land. The outline and its location, as well as the potential use in the future, were certainly relevant to the previous award of similar land in the area, but there was evidence in the intervening period. The ad hoc price increase to reduce the value to determine the current. Will Land Market Value Appellate Court not find any legal or factual error in reading the misrepresentation or evidence or misrepresentation of the law on this article, the value of similar land value obtained in the previous award Can be a direct source of action. Land for the fair determination of the market value of land on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the correct way, for a similar land in the adjoining area shortly before the notification is issued. Was based on a sale transaction. Appellate Court refuses to interfere in Chief Justice's decision to grant leave to appeal
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
