Article 61 Supreme Appellate Court by autonomous jurisdiction, exercise of non-payment of salaries Supreme Appellate Court took notice of the news published in the newspaper that salaries to hundreds of government department employees on the basis of work charges Were not given. The court appointed a judicial officer to investigate the matter and submit its report, and the authorities argue that the rules and regulations of the employees were violated by the then superintendent engineer and the employees There was no service to the department for claiming salaries. For the report prepared by the Inquirer Officer, some of the remaining employees had been working since their appointment, the effect being that the Superintendent Engineer was able to appoint the work-in-charge employees, therefore, despite the objection that the rules / regulations for appointments were made. Was violated, the employees in the work charge in their right wa were entitled to pay salaries for the services rendered to the departmental authorities by the relevant authorities depriving them of their legal rights Instead of taking action against allegations of withholding salaries of the concerned authorities, Was deemed competent to take action. The legal and the aggrieved person can go to legal proceedings to retrieve their claim because the inquiry was heard by the Judicial Officer in this case and the Supreme Appeal Court refused to take any exception to the conclusion in which the competent authority May take action against officers / officers who are paid employees without charge.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
