O VII, R 2 and O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 160 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Government) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) suit for recovery of money ex. The request for separation of the party decree was filed after the suit was lodged with the previous decree, after more than four months, the defendant filed an application to approve the order, which is the limitation act. Was to be filed within thirty days in accordance with Article 164 of 1908. While the former party was present at the time of the decree, Knowledge filed the petition under section IX, R 13, CPC, Section 5, Limitation Act, 1908, which was four months after being attached to the prescribed limit. Delays filing for condolences. Delays were needed to explain each day's delay so that a general and ambiguous statement beyond the threshold period would not be sufficient to support the contempt of the Advance Advance Advance Advance or the Court of Appeal to reject the extension. Was neither extinct nor practicable. And the Chief Justice, in the circumstances, rightly rejected the condolence request.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
