TAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN versus CHIEF JUSTICE, PESHAWAR HIGH COURT THROUGH REGISTRAR
Section 5 Northwest Frontier Province Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 2 (1) (E), 4 (1) (IV), 5 and 6 serve as Additional District and Sessions Judges Appellant was dismissed. He was dismissed from the job after a charge sheet and inquiry against him on serious allegations of moral and financial misconduct submitted by the appellant in his own defense, had linked him substantially with the complaining woman. According to his own view that the wife of the suspect's character, who had established relations with the complainant during his posting at various stations as a Judicial Officer, was himself a judge of judicial affairs. There would be ample evidence of non-release and such conduct was unacceptable to the Judicial Officer. There was enough evidence against the appellant to hold that his conduct was completely covered by misconduct when a citizen of the North West Frontier Province was punished by the servants (Discipline under Discipline). Under the Rules, 1973 North West Frontier Province Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1973, investigations were conducted against the appellant in a very fair and transparent manner, where the appellant fully participated and completed the crossing. Given the opportunity Review the evidence against him and also present evidence in his defense During the arguments, no complaint was made against the inquiry proceedings [after fulfilling all formal commitments, the authorized officer dismissed the job. Recommended to impose huge fines and dismissed from the competent authority who was the Chief Justice of the High Court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
