MUHAMMAD JAMSHAID versus GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D.I. KHAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Applicant Applicant Challenges Appointment of Defendants as Lecturers by University Syndicate The Board of Appointment passed the recommendation of the petitioner, who was appointed to the post of lecturer, who screened the relevant advertisement. Was not mentioned in which the applicant participated. And he qualified in the aforementioned test Providing screening test Although the ad was not mentioned in the newspaper for vacant posts, it was not deadly to mention the screening test in the ad as not all details were required to be advertised. It was not necessary to mention the screening test in the advertisement, especially when the syndicate approved the provision of screening test at his meeting, there was no doubt that the applicant was the gold medalist, But winning the gold or getting the first division was not the only guarantee of appointment, because If it was me, there would be no examination and such person could have been hired without any regular work, Gold Medalist or highly educated person could not claim the appointment alone. It faced some formal proceedings, such as a test and an interview petitioner, that required the constitutional petition to prove unlawful, a violation of fundamental rights or a jurisdiction. In the present case, a permanently constituted committee took action, and after consideration, a list of merits was made and recommended, which was approved by the syndicate at the meeting and approved by the syndicate's respondents. Later on the lives of the concerned officials
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
