About 2 days after the incident, the complainant recorded his supplementary statement and accused the accused of failing with the accused, but on the basis of the suspicion, it was almost three days after the incident. It was alleged that he broke the news that he was about to commit suicide, the suspect fell on a suspected person should receive evidence from unforgivable sources to punish the capital accused, which is lacking, in the present case. In the criminal justice system, the perpetrator thinks about the crime. The absence of legal evidence was never acknowledged by the courts; there is strong and legally admissible evidence for a defendant to be sentenced to death by a court verdict Reach a conclusive conclusion, otherwise, if any doubt is found, it will be reasonable to justify it, not as a matter of grace, but as a matter of principle of truth, in the system well. The embedded, easily disregarded Court of Appeals reviewing the evidence, each and every evidence in favor of the prosecutor extraordinarily high Or, that he was rescued by the clearly incorrect conclusions which were minor and the wrong meaning. , Dishonest corrections made by prosecution witnesses at trial, dishonest investigations conducted by police through the acquisition of witnesses and forged evidence; and when many contacts were missing in the series, Beyond doubt, the accused failed miserably to prove the crime, the trial court neither observed judicial care nor caution
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
