The suspects were traveling in the car near Section 9 and 29, where 18,500 grams of hashish was found hidden under the front and rear seats, the prosecution presenting both the defendants reliable and reliable. Was charged against. Evidence at the trial, where all witnesses made consistent statements on the salient features of the case, with minor contradictions in the intervention of the car, recovery of marijuana and its weight, attributed to the memory loss. Can be done Over time, the Chemical Examiner returned the report saying that the ban was for Charis' confession of the co-accused, the driver of the undercover vehicle, because he had confessed to having taken the marijuana for the accused. Was being paid for which he was being paid. The co-accused confessed to the extent of a KG that was in his possession and control conference, although the subject of the accused was an excuse in nature, however, careful scrutiny reveals that he too cleverly told the story. Had made a sharp turn and threw the burden on the other accused principal that the statement / confession of an accused was to be taken in full. And the selection and selection process was not to be ruled out, only in cases where other evidence of the prosecution was denied / dismissed by the court which was not the case. Because not only 18,500 grams of marijuana was recovered from the motorcade, which was under the active and special control of both the accused at the time, but it was also three important witnesses who had no ill-will or ill-will ? Charged
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
