Articles 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), the AXLI, R31 suit were declared and the permanent injunction immunity suit was finally decided by the trial court and the appeals of the Court of Appeal, in which the most important issue was About what was the limit. The plaintiff made a reasonable request in his written statement, but the trial court failed to resolve this important issue and make no clear decision on which the appellate court also recorded no record in this regard. Yes, despite the appeal memo, it was very important. In particular, the trial court was upset that it accepted the responsibility to resolve the issue arising from the parties' requests. The appeal of the appeal memorandum reveals that apart from raising a number of objections, including not forming a case to this extent, the Appellate Court had failed to answer all these questions as the first court of fact, OXLI, In accordance with the provisions of R 31, the CPC Appellate Court prosecuted the decision of the plaintiff's appeal in a slim manner without accepting his obligation to deal with each of the grounds aggravated by the appellate court's memorandum. The appellate court has to look at all disputes in their true context, absences in which the appellate court's prejudice in the decision and order case were set aside, and the appellate court to act on this matter. I was sent.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
