Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), O XVII, R 3, O XLI, R 1 and Section 115 Declaration Claim Failure to Sue for Failure to Produce Evidence Despite the Plaintiff's failure to present evidence They were given many opportunities to present evidence. Finally, notices were given to the plaintiffs under OXVII, R 3, CPC to present their evidence, but the plaintiff failed to comply with the trial case and did not present evidence and the trial court Removed the case using your own options. Under OXVII, R3, the CPC appeal filed by the defendants against the orders of the trial court was also dismissed; the plaintiffs ignored both the decisions and orders of the courts below the request for review, The plaintiff claimed that even if the trial court wanted action. Under O XVII, R 3, CPC, it was the responsibility to make a decision about the properties, considering the material available on the record and after hearing the parties' arguments, under O XVII, 3, The CPC, using the options, should consider the trial court's material available on the record, but in the present case the plaintiff had challenged the record of the revenue in relation to the number of disputed measles, which they had to give to the owners and the defendants. The owners did not have any other evidence on record that the trial court could consider in order to correct the income record. That is, the trial court, in the circumstances, had no other option but to dismiss the case, especially when the plaintiff was given several opportunities. Evidence presented
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
