The defendant was dismissed by the trial court and the appellate court for permanent dismissal of the Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, Rr 11, 13 and Section 11 trial. The lawsuit filed by the trial court was rejected. The appeal filed by the plaintiff under and after OVII, R 11, CPC was dismissed as the case under OVII, R 11, CPC was dismissed on the two cases mentioned above. First, that the plaintiffs had no reason to take action and secondly, that the wanted plaintiff under Section 92 did not seek permission from the Advocate General, before the CPC finally decided the competent jurisdiction. And the plaintiff later settled a case against the defendants. Regarding the same property, and due process, a fresh invoice, although allowed by the trial court even after the plaintiff can be denied, could not be presented even after appeal against the injunction. And the trial was annexed to the court for unconditional removal. The appellate court ruling and the latest case could not succeed in overturning the plaintiff, the following two courts rightly rejected the plaintiff under OVII, affecting R 11 CPC by the principle of res judata.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
