Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR versus STATE

Prosecutors praising the evidence in the drug section have consistently accused the suspects that a kilogram of marijuana exists, saying the witnesses have been cross-examined for a long time, but nothing was brought to their mouth. Because nothing can be created in the prosecution's version. It was a record to show that the prosecution had an unlawful or wrong motive to accuse or was beyond any doubt on the part of any witness, the accused demanded a reduction of the sentence, but The trial could not be reduced because of the trial. The court had already adopted a very gentle view by awarding three months \ RI for one kilogram of hashish \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010

• IBRAHIM KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 1377
• NEIK NAWAZ v. Mst. RAHIM JANA BIBI 2010 CLC 1379
• AKHTAR ALI KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1386
• ANJUMAN IRFAN-UL-ISLAM TRUST v. MUFTI SHAKEEL 2010 CLC 1393
• MUHAMMAD AAMIR RAUF v. AHMAD NAWAZ 2010 YLR 1422
• SAJJAD ALI v. AURANGZEB KHAN 2010 CLC 1430
• AURANGZEB v. State 2010 YLR 1439
• ZIA-UD-DIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1448

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Quaidabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes