Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AAMIR RAUF versus AHMAD NAWAZ

O XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and O XLII R 1 (d) Application for appearing suit leave for recovery of money and defending the preceding order, setting aside the failure to present the appeal to the defendant, The ex parte order filed by the defendant against the earlier petition against him was not dismissed by the dismissal as no proceedings were filed on the defendant under the law and the plaintiff was not connected with the summons. Was made and as a result the defendant did not know the nature of the case and was late requested for condolences. Be filed. The impugned orders were set aside and the case was re-sent to a trial court for strict decision in accordance with law.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010

• NEIK NAWAZ v. Mst. RAHIM JANA BIBI 2010 CLC 1379
• AKHTAR ALI KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1386
• ANJUMAN IRFAN-UL-ISLAM TRUST v. MUFTI SHAKEEL 2010 CLC 1393
• ZAHIR v. State 2010 MLD 1403
• SAJJAD ALI v. AURANGZEB KHAN 2010 CLC 1430
• AURANGZEB v. State 2010 YLR 1439
• ZIA-UD-DIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1448
• ABDUR RASHID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1452

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes