Section 2 30un law testimony (1984) of 10), reiterating the evidence that the unnatural behavior of witnesses was not established at the time of the benefit of the suspect in preventing the victim at the time of the incident It was alleged that Has a knife. Dead with repeated scissors that resulted in the latter's death, the motive was that the deceased, who was a head teacher, transferred the suspect to another school, with several knives on the body of the deceased. There were injuries to the nineteen, all the accused were equipped with just one scissor, and it must have been a long time for the many wounds to be killed by one scissor, however, the three witnesses, who were all involved, remained silent. The spectators remained, and they did not respond or show any response when the accused was allegedly in a close relationship. It was very natural for the victim to stab the deceased by R but in the present case, the witness did not do anything or tried to chase the accused, the presence of witnesses at the place of crime. Was shocked by the supernatural conduct of the court, so his testimony could not be relied upon explicitly. It was believed that the victim was killed when no one was present to rescue him. The motive for the incident was not established in any way by any documentary evidence or secondary evidence of credible nature. The victim, who was a head teacher, had no choice but to transfer the accused to another school. The impetus for this event is not to appeal to a completely weak, artificial and intelligent mind since the account
