Section 9 (c) Detection of drug addiction proof sentence, reduction in death sentence has already been changed Drugs have been recovered from different packets for each test to take separate samples from each packet. The accused were allegedly found in possession of 20 drug paraphernalia. The bag contained 20 packets and each packet weighed one kilogram of one (1) gram drug per packet and, after being assembled, produced 10 sealed parcels of 20/20 grams of drugs, That if the drug was recovered, a separate drug sample was to be prepared for each packet for chemical testing and sent for inspection, however, in the present case, after collecting the recovered drug addicts only 10 packets were produced, therefore, in view of the proportion of the decision, Aamir Zeb v State (PLD 2012 SC 380), the recovery of drug addicts was only 10 kgs. It was proved that in such circumstances the accused could be more likely under section 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, under the proviso to Section 9 (c) of the Drug Supplies Act 1997. Punishment is provided if the quantity of drugs recovered exceeds 10kg. Avoid life imprisonment because in the present case the quantities of drugs recovered from the accused were confined to the limit of 10 kilograms (and not more), so they cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment. Had already gone beyond that. For more than 14 years, the Supreme Court had changed the death sentence in these circumstances.