GHAZALA TEHSIN ZOHRA versus MEHR GHULAM DASTAGIR KHAN
Arts 128 (1) (a) and 2 (9) of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (v. 1962), Section 2 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 of the Muslim Personal Lottery of Children's DNA The test was, to provide for Article 128 (1) (a) of the Scope of Law Permit Law, 1984, to make a reservation in section 2 of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act, 1962, the birth of the marriage, final Proof of legal status Legal protection and defense against the defamation of women and children In the present case, the father requested that the declaration be made of the natural / inferior nature of the children born of this marriage. There was no father. , And that any official record in this regard was a fake and was fraudulently produced. The father also claimed that DNA tests should be performed to ensure that he was denied. In the present case, the reviewing court, which upheld the judgment of the High Court Waldity children, not only became pregnant but was also born during the provision of marriage, Article 128 (1) (a) of the Martyrdom of the Law 1984 I was discharged in a language that was a protector of social solidarity and values of society, which certainly believed in setting the condition that a child was born within two years of the dissolution of marriage between their parents. (The mother is unmarried) will provide final proof of her legal status otherwise, neither the classical Islamic jurisprudence nor the legal martyrdom of 1984 The fraudsters could have disappeared from the scientific fact that the normal duration of human embryonic pregnancy was about nine months. The Conan testimony, 128 of 1984, was that set forth in the above article
family advocate from Musakhel lawyer
