Section 242424/33 337F (V) / 7 337A (I) / Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) was appealed against the success of the Qatal-Amdt, Hashima and Shuja-j-Khalifa witnesses. The presence did not prove beyond any reasonable doubt that contradiction of material contention was found in the evidence of the prosecution witness, who overruled the prosecutor's case, prosecuting witnesses said that the location of the incident was a thorough investigation, when That the site's plan looked as if no one had said it completely. Contradictions also suggested the absence of both Prosecuting witnesses, medical evidence contradicts the ocular version. Such contradictions did not support the prosecution's case when a suspect was sentenced by a competent court facing a lengthy trial. If he is acquitted, then he will benefit from it twice. Innocence, which may not hurt in the slightest, unless it is proved that the verdict of the Breath Trial was plainly illegal, obnoxious, obsessive and could result. In the fateful decision of a lawyer for a complainant in a serious miscarriage of justice, he failed to identify anything that was based on a proper scrutiny of the evidence on record.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
