SYED ZAFFAR ALIAS QAZI ZAFFAR AFRIDI versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY INTERIOR
Sections 30, 31 and 32 allegedly on the Narcotic Sub-Metal Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 9 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution. Property confiscation scope was obtained from smuggling money under which the applicants seized / smuggled the money under which the applicants seized through smuggling money, prior to prohibiting Arts 3, 4 and 9. Cases were registered under the (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979 and under Section 9 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, but were finally acquitted of the charges after which the applicant related The property in question was confiscated / confiscated which was due to the money seized by the applicants in the smuggling case. The petitioner was that since he had been honorably discharged in all the criminal cases registered against him, the complaint was filed under section 3 of the Anti-Smuggling Act, 1977, neither by the courts nor by the courts. Could neither be entertained nor decided. Specifically, the court could order the Arms 19 and 39 under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, while the accused was sentenced. The applicants were not convicted, but were acquitted of honor when the applicants acquired the property, during which time they were not charged or convicted for any trafficking offense. The complainant failed to prove the allegations against the applicants, while the applicants had completely discharged their responsibility. Real estate trafficking
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
