To support this charge under Order 3 of the Prohibition Order (Order of Head), Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 22 Manufacturing, possessing or possessing intoxicating bail. No evidence was available for. In 1979, the manufacture, import or export of liquor machines for bottling bottles or empty bottles against the accused can hardly be said to be proof of the manufacture of alcohol. While Article 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979, which was guaranteed, was also not made against the accused. As he was not taking the material elsewhere, the serious violation of 103 G, CRPC and the Prohibited Order (Enforcement) Order 1979 were committed in the case that the prosecution provided no evidence. Did not submit that either the accused was the owner. Apart from the special possession of the house or part of the house where it was recovered, the report of the Franzic Science Laboratory was not available on file to show that what was recovered was in fact alcohol / drug addict. Was accepted on bail, circumstance
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
