Section 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The applicant of the illegal disposal was reversed by the trial court order under which his complaint was filed under Section 3/4 of the Unlawful Disposition Act, 2005 Filed under, the available record of the case was never suggested. That any illegal and unlawful action to evict the applicant was done by the respondents, which was an illicit act to take seriously under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, which was prepared by the police The site plan shows that the piece of disputed property appears to be part of the property owned by the respondents and nothing was available on the parcel record except the unregistered sale deadline of 1/4 Marl which reflects the ownership only. Also not enough for the applicant to occupy the property. Whenever the applicant finds himself frustrated, he may approach the competent and court in the absence of any evidence that reflects the ownership or occupation of the property by declaring his title and PO. I, could not be licensed on the basis of unregistered sale deed to claim unauthorized possession of the disputed property just days before the complaint. The said property was charged with illegal and unlawful disposal without any specific evidence In order to make a case under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, one must come up with positive evidence of ownership of the legitimate property. Or lawful possession of any of the properties and then illegal and illegal possession of the property in which
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
