The pre-emption trial court dismissed the pre-emption case only on the basis that the pre-emptor failed to perform the required negotiations in accordance with the law, so the superior right to issue a superior was before the plaintiff in favor of the appellate court. The right of sovereignty was decided, however, by the plaintiff appeals court overturning the trial decision on the issue of performance, partially deciding the case with the plaintiff / the apex court, in partial judgment. ??????? Negotiation of the declaration that the required `` things were done in accordance with the law by the plaintiff, the plaintiff was disclosed as a co-participant in the suit and the shopkeeper also became a co-owner of the undisclosed property on registered power. Prior to the record of the unlawful transaction, the sale deeds further revealed that the real estate property has changed its role from agricultural to residential residential. In the circumstances, the property cannot claim to be a co-owner and the site plan. According to the restriction, only the claim of a partner in the exclusive rights associated with the property or the exploitation can That is, when the buyer had previously purchased some part of the suit property and became a co-owner of the real estate transaction, as the property had changed its role as a resident of agriculture and in the case of the rights holder. But the appellate court had the prerogative right to contest the finding. The impression that compared with the defendant of r \ n \ r \ n was that the suit had the right to be vacant before being a co-owner.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
