ABDUL RAZAQ versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, COMMUNICATION WORKS, PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, QUETTA
Sections 4 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition were transferred to the applicant and he was charged with the post where he was transferred, but within three months he was transferred again. Was. He was not allowed to remain in the post for at least two years, while committing it during the transfer by the authorities; while a junior officer of the lower rank was appointed to the post, secondly, the government Violation of the policy was put on hold, and the retention of the constitutional request created controversy. Due to a dispute over the posting and exchange of public employees, this option has been put into service terms and conditions, which cannot be challenged by the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction. Further, the applicant was not a grieving person, meaning he was obliged to serve within or outside the province as a public servant within the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution, while transferring his employees to the competent authority and Posting is an option under which the provisions of Section 10 of the Balochistan Civil Servants Act, 1974, did not commit any illegal proceedings in the unclean transfer notification act, however the policy laid down by the official transfer Violation was made and the posting of the applicant was done only on the wishes of a minister, not legal and Nor was it appropriate, though the relevant authorities had the authority to transfer and post their employees, but this power should be exercised with due care and caution and without the intention of the lower level officers in the rank of higher grade.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
