Find a Lawyer

QAIM KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34/147/148/149 murder amd, attempt to commit murder conviction, disorderly bail, defendant's grant was not named in the FIR and Two witnesses were involved. Accusers There was no other false evidence yet in these supplementary statements that prior to linking a person to a criminal commission, the fiduciary responsibility of the accused involved in the crime would be recorded in the case. During the police investigation, no crime was recovered from the accused. The accused could not be detained indefinitely and could not be restrained as the accused was allowed to be punished in case of bail.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• HASIL KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 1006
• ADALAT KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1042
• Sardar AKHTAR JAN MENGAL v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior Islamabad 2010 YLR 1044
• ABDUL RAZAQ v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, COMMUNICATION WORKS, PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, QUETTA 2010 PLC(CS) 1046
• FATEH MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1082
• LIAQUAT ALI v. SABRULLAH 2010 YLR 1083
• Haji GHULAM RASOOL v. NASARULLAH 2010 CLC 1138
• KHAYAL MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1145

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes