Section 13 (e) definition of weapons recovery evidence relied solely on the evidence presented by the prosecution, the contents of the FIR did not substantiate the views and theories adopted by the trial court while dealing with the case. There was nothing available to say about the impact in the FIR. When the police allegedly raided his house, the recovery of the weapons from his possession while the presence of the accused in front of a certain house during the overnight hours did not provide any explanation on record by the prosecution. Where Kalashnikov and two magazines were located at the time of the recovery, the alleged magazines and cartridges were recovered, were not presented to the court, the recovery of the alleged articles from the possession of the accused was not cleared of any doubts, it would be of benefit. The trial court was not given by the trial court, which failed to witness the contradictions and flaws in the accused. The statements of the witnesses failed to prove the charges against the prosecution trial court, but that decision could not be sustained, the trial court's decision was set aside and the accused acquitted of the charge under section 13 (e). had gone. West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and ordered to be released
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
