Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAJI SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Qatil Ahmed Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him to fine and life imprisonment. With the High Court, the appeal of the trial court was not upheld on appeal. The eyewitnesses and the prosecution's witnesses only supported the incident, but they did not allege the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses revealed that upon hearing the screams, they arrived at the scene and found the victim dead. They did not see the two criminals. Hostility was not declared by the prosecution, meaning that their evidence was admissible, no other evidence was available to link the accused to the commission of the crime, in the circumstances, precisely It was said that in the absence of ocular testimony there could be no punishment. Based on the judgment, no writings or evidence were read by the Supreme Court, no intervention was required under the circumstances. Leave request for rence appeal dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.