Section 417 (2A) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 Appeal against acquittal of convicted AMD evidence, report by Franzic Science Laboratory of allegedly recovered guns from statements of two eyewitnesses. The series was negative. Recorded 3/4 days after the incident, both witnesses, who were not present at the time of the incident, revised their statements in the court in the complainant's statement, therefore it was untrue that he intended Revealed, the law did not prove Moto was an important fact, but the prosecution failed to establish the presence of the complainant at the time of the incident, other evidence on record did not have his own version, depending. It was not enough to make the High Court examine the entire evidence and correctly conclude that the witnesses were not present. And the case was not without any doubt. Because of his disagreement with the High Court, the appeal against the decision was dismissed
