Sections 12 and 27 (b) for the consideration of valuable information without notice to the trial court for the specific performance of the contract to sell the purchase principle to the extent of alternative relief from the receipt of money only Was rejected, but the lower appellate court ordered the important relief decision passed by the lower appellate court, and the ruling which the High Court upheld with the amended jurisdiction, in the judgment passed by the High Court. The Supreme Court could not find any deficiency or illegal thing. The facts between the parties could not be proved. Could It was clearly pointing to the intention of the parties in favor of the plaintiff, which was declared a complete sale in all respects between the parties, therefore, the sale proceedings in favor of the plaintiffs in the interest of the defendants. The plaintiff knew of the predecessor in the interest of the defendants through the sale contract owners in favor of the sale because it was clear om his own evidence was appropriate after the lower appellate court examined the evidence on record. The defendant used discretion in favor of the plaintiff, which was rejected by the High Court.
