ABDUL MUKTADAR versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, JHANG
The complainant for the names and other details of the two accused named in the complaint proceedings against the accused persons after recording the initial evidence of sections 200, 202 and 204 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 Qatl amd private complaint. The complaint from the petition cannot be termed as a sacred document that cannot be altered, however its effects need to be scrutinized before giving permission; Correction cannot be done two different things at once. Previously the named defendants had neither the deletion nor the addition or substitution, but the correctional simplicity clauses 202 and 204, which had no effect on the merits of the case, continued proceedings under the CRPC, depending on the content Much will depend on availability or availability. The names of the accused had to comply with the correction issued against those accused whose names were tried to correct, due to inadvertent mistake or lack of knowledge, the proper names cannot be mentioned if they In no way was the prejudice or harm caused by a mistake, the names of the properly named accused could not be mentioned in the complaint, no new person was being involved in the present case through the proposed amendment, Such a request was accepted, in the circumstances
