CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE versus NAWAB KHAN
R22 (a) Handbook for Drawing and Distributing Officers, Chapter, IX, R 96 (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 1212 (2) and (3) Salary and Pensionary Benefits Previous Service, Absence of License The count was determined by another government organization, intercepted by the Supreme Court scope appellant, for a fact-finding on a previous post, and his complaint was that his previous service in the previous government organization was due to the appointment of salaries. And the Pension Benefit Service Tribunal allowed partial appeal and was not allowed. In the last appointment, the assessment of the fact that any provision of security in his salary was recorded by the service tribunal was in accordance with the rules on this subject and the law framed by the Supreme Court Service Tribunal had made 22 (a). Plaintiff had correctly denied the appellant's second aid. The Basic Rule Parties failed to identify any weakness or illegality in the decision passed by the Service Tribunal and there was no question of public importance such as increased ticle212 (2) of the Constitution considered under R The Tribunal of Service Tribunal had to ascertain the fact and could not demand any interference by the Supreme Court while exercising the powers under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution was always arbitrary in the constitutional jurisdiction because the service Had The case was decided under the rules and regulations of this case, which the Supreme Court made the law, therefore, the Supreme Court refused to exercise its discretion under Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution in favor of appeals. ?
