JUSTICE HASNAT AHMED KHAN versus REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
The Preamble, Sections 3 and 5 of the Corteum of Act (LXIV of 1976) amended the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 204, 270 AA and 184 (3) contempt of court Ordinance 2003. Section 20 of the Constitution; and contempt of court Ordinance, 2003 has declared contempt of court order, 1976 as a contempt of court ordinance, and 2003 is the current law to regulate the proceedings of contempt of court case. And in the matters connected, the defendants were issued under the contempt of court Act 1976 under the orders of the 14-member Bench of the Supreme Court, could not amend the provision of the law holding a five-member bench. Under Article 204 of the Constitution, notices were issued with sections 3 and 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976 or by reading any other applicable section of the relevant law. In the notice, reference to the supply of any other competent provision of the relevant law was substituted for the provisions of the contempt of court Act, 1976, and it was stated that the sentence was included as a precaution which stated that The sentence should be read as derogatory generals. The Court Act, 1976 was not able to impose the provisions in the sentence on the words of the relevant law which meant any law other than the contempt of court act, 1976, if the relevant court had found it, therefore, It is not necessary to refer the case again to the High Bench for correction of the order of issuance of notices, arguing that the High Court Act, 1976 was repealed, as the constitutional petitions of section 10 (2A) Be heard as Intro-Court of Appeals. , As applicable to the contempt of court Act, 1976 as the Supreme Court
