CHAIRMAN, ANTI-CORRUPTION ENQUIRIES versus ABDUL WAHEED
R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Applicant / Appointment Counsel for the Department claimed that the recruitment / appointment of the respondents was not made by the Public Promotion Committee, but it was not for any provision or service. Was unable to pinpoint the rule of. The service of the defendant, which was appointed by the respondents of the Development Committee of the Department, in exchange for appointment of the respondent / selection, was appointed by the BS5 in exchange with the Police Department in the Anti-Corruption Establishment which was against any of the legal rules. In the event of a breach, the relevant service was subject to the Rules. Regardless of the law or any authority beyond the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the Department, it was difficult to hold that the Department acted illegally or without authority the Service Tribunal had extensive discussion of the facts of the appeal and appealed to the applicants. The source defended that there were no legitimate questions for the law. Article 212 (3) of the company in the sense of leave to appeal to the public importance appeal NTStation, leave application for appeal was dismissed, in the circumstances
