Section 302 (b) / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 345 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-reaction to evidence does not prove to be a crime of quadruple murder. Effect of death of the whole family. Slammed. The defendants were sentenced to death on each count for revenge for refusing to marry and for stealing property, who asked for permission to increase the crime, so legal witnesses gave a very accurate account of the incident. Provided, the ocular evidence retained the evidence of the cross examination, except for some of Eve's testimony, some minor contradictions were not broken, the four eyewitnesses were convinced by the two courts below, and by them. Such an appreciation of the incoming evidence and conclusions was not inaccurate, assigning the accused role of the accused weak or unproven. In case it was not fatal. Each eye was clearly stated by eye witnesses to be performed and executed by the witness, when examined at the touching medical evidence was not sufficiently effective. The apex court either refused to bring the matter under the purview of a missing case or a case was dropped for the accused to take advantage of the suspect, the Supreme Court refused to grant leave to settle the crime. Had done. Refused
