Article 29 Conviction of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Art 117 and 120 illegal articles of duty to suppose that the court is of the essence of the trial under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, which constituted the accused Is. Act, unless the contrary is proved. If the case is to be owned by the narcotic drug rather than the prosecution, then the fact that the drug was obtained from the possession of the drug accused, then the court must demand that until the accused is proven Not that he wasn't in it. The possession of such drugs must prove that the accused has some direct relationship with or has been dealt with the drug. If the prosecution proves to have the articles neglected or in his physical custody, then the burden of proving that the accused was not deliberately in his possession. The article states that the practical difficulty of litigation to prove anything in the defendant's specialized knowledge must have diluted the legislature if the purpose of the Narcotic Substances Act of 1997 was established on litigation. They will be disappointed, based on the Control Section 29 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, that the prosecution has only to prove that the accused has dealt with or has physical custody or direct connection to the drug, Unless the accused testifies that he did not knowingly or consciously keep the article, against such evidence R, under Section 29 of the Narcotics Control Act of 1997 articles can be convicted accused.
