Find a Lawyer

ANEESUR REHMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Rr 3 (a) (b), 4 (1) (b) (iv) and 6 from the Services Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) on the charge of disqualification. Applicant appealed against dismissal and corruption, stating that the penalties were dismissed by Prima on the accuracy of the service tribunal, it appears that the applicant was not given the opportunity to examine the public witnesses nor himself. Was allowed to guide his evidence. The court and the appeal were converted into appeals

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• Justice HASNAT AHMED KHAN v. REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 2010 PLD 806
• MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. State 2010 SCMR 806
• Syed KAMAL SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary 2010 PLC(CS) 809
• HASSAN DIN v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2010 SCMR 810
• Nawabzada IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN BAR v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ISLAMABAD 2010 PLD 817
• Moulvi MUHAMMAD AZEEM v. Alhaj MEHMOOD KHAN BANGISH 2010 SCMR 817
• DEPUTY POST MASTER GENERAL, REGION-III, POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD v. MUHAMMAD JAVAID 2010 PLC(CS) 818
• SHAHID HAYAT v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 PLC(CS) 820

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Chishtian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes