BANK OF PUNJAB versus HARIS STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.
Arts 184 (3) and 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 23A (6) of the Constitution Scope Case under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, in the present case, from a financial scam in the cemetery is about. As a result of the bank's history in Pakistan's banking history, the bank has uncovered an immense amount of eleven billion rupees, which was actually about a million innocent deposits of small amounts of money which saved lives and property. The serious threat that steps in the Supreme Court take to protect and protect the property of such a large portion of the population is an important responsibility. It was that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to control the investigation of a criminal case and the reasons presented in support of it. The dispute was that such control over the investigation of a criminal case by the Supreme Court could be prejudicial to the accused, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of each case and the circumstances surrounding the country. Given the facts and circumstances of the present case, it would have been unfounded and unwise. If the Supreme Court had refused to intervene in defending the fundamental rights of such a large section of the public and left it only to the relevant NAB officials, who had done nothing in this matter for almost two years. Had witnessed the silent spectacle of the whole drama and the only accusers fleeing abroad. Such sheer negligence was to examine and monitor the indifference and maliciousness that the constitutional frameworks brought to the High Court under Article 199 and to the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution.
