LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus FIRDOUS STEEL MILLS (PVT.) LTD
Arts 185 (3) and 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitutional application before the acquisition of High Court Maintenance Land, Lahore Development Authority (LDA) denied the LDA and replaced the land acquired. 16 kanal plot exempted The applicant, upon whom Steel Mills approves the Constitutional application in the approval of the High Court order and the LDA's order under the LDA to separate this order of the LDA application. Is available in the light of the comments filed under Section 12 (2), CPC. Modifying the application under section 12 (2), rejecting both such requests by the LDA High Court endorsement officials and partial comments on the ground facts on the LDA's place and policy. By entering, the applicant was charged with a safe and secure order. The High Court may, in its favor, decide such an application under section 12 (2) of the CPC without any issue. The High Court had erred in the law that such a request would not be allowed. The memorandum submitted all relevant documents to the Supreme Court, which instead of remanding the High Court respondents, decided to decide the case on its own, with the LDA's exemption policy based on the Town Planner's observation. Mentioned in the award. The applicant could not grant any right on the basis of any clause of the law. The applicant was obliged to maintain a constitutional petition by the LDA for violating the legal provisions. The constitutional petition was not intact because the LDA A vacuum of legal rules
