Proof of Section 302 (b) murder assessment, the prosecution failed to prove the motive for the incident, despite the presence of other witnesses and people at the crime scene vacant and rifle sites, the complainant himself He had chosen, along with the complainant, in the preparation of the trial, along with the recovery of the testimony of the section HO motivator, and he was constantly changing his statement at trial. So as to strengthen the prosecution's case. The prosecution could not present a plausible explanation for the delay of 12 hours in filing the FIR, it seemed that the matter was only consulted and prepared at the time, and that the case was fatal to the prosecution and the complainant. And the other spectacles were not witnesses. With the deceased present at the time of the incident, it was found that there was a fatal blow in the prosecution case by the complainant or the investigating officer, without the blank production of the crime before the trial court for examination or identification. Otherwise, according to certified documents from the Forensic Science Laboratory, the collection of blank and rifle crime is a controversial piece of evidence, and even after the expulsion of the accused himself, it was not enough to convict the accused. The evidence said that the recovery of the incidents, therefore, was significant, the benefit of the doubt was given to the accused in the circumstances and accordingly he was acquitted.
