Sections 10 (4), 11 and 16 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 380 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal for consideration of the argument that initially. The case was registered under Sections 11 and 16. The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, and section 380 PPC, in which the complainant clearly stated that the accused had been motivated by the accused to commit the adultery while at trial. He had improved his statement when saying that the kidnapper presented a very different story. At the pistol point, the accused robbed him of 25,000 rupees, then his children were taken away and he was told to come to the bus stand, otherwise his children would be killed. In connection with the recovery, it was stated that he and his children had been rescued from the railway station. He was sent to the capital by the magistrate after being arrested by the station suspect and presented to him eight days later. Was described under Section 6464 Cr CRPC. The order was made, after that, she was handed over to the complainant who is her husband. The accused also claimed that in his statement, the kidnapper admitted that he did not hear anyone crying while he was being taken aboard the bus. Hotel
